American Singer Mary Millben Backs PM Modi, Raises Questions Over Alleged US Funding of CJP

New Delhi | October 14, 2026: American singer Mary Millben has sparked a political debate after publicly backing Prime Minister Narendra Modi and urging young Indians to speak out on issues concerning the country’s political future. In a social media post, Millben also alleged that US-based donors opposed to Modi’s leadership were funding Abhijeet Dipke and the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). The funding allegations have not been independently verified.

‘This Is Not the Time to Be Silent’

Addressing young patriots in India, Millben called on them to raise their voices and remain confident in the country’s political direction under Modi’s leadership.

She argued that certain international donors follow a broader pattern of targeting conservative leaders by supporting individuals who subsequently return to their home countries and mobilize opposition movements. Millben claimed these activities could affect national development and governance, but did not provide publicly verifiable evidence in the post to substantiate the allegations.

Political Funding Claims Under Scrutiny

Millben’s remarks have brought renewed attention to questions surrounding foreign funding, political activism and the role of international networks in domestic politics.

Her allegations against Dipke and CJP raise questions that would require documentary evidence, financial disclosures or findings from an official investigation to establish. Political disagreements and opposition to a government, by themselves, do not demonstrate foreign interference.

A Wider Debate Over Democracy and Political Opposition

The statement highlights the growing role of international public figures in domestic political debates. By directly addressing India’s youth, Millben has framed support for Modi as part of a broader argument about political stability, conservative leadership and democratic participation.

Her remarks also raise a fundamental question: how should democracies distinguish legitimate political dissent from any proven attempt at foreign interference?